This editorial policy explains how we create content, how we stay independent, and how we handle accuracy and corrections.
Editorial independence
Our reviews, rankings and verdicts are based on hands-on testing and analysis — never on commercial relationships. Advertisers and affiliate partners cannot buy a better score, a higher ranking, or favourable coverage. If that ever conflicts with a recommendation, the reader comes first.
How we make money
StackVerdict is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you purchase through affiliate links on our site, at no additional cost to you. This helps fund our testing. See our affiliate disclosure for details. Commissions do not influence our editorial judgment — how we reach verdicts is described in how we test.
Accuracy & sourcing
We aim for accurate, current information. We test tools directly, cite primary sources where relevant, and clearly date our content. SaaS products change, so we review and update articles over time.
Corrections
If we get something wrong, we fix it. Spotted an error or an outdated price or feature? Email [email protected] and we’ll review and correct it promptly, updating the “last updated” date on the article.
Author expertise
Our content is produced by people with real experience in marketing, media buying and using SaaS tools day to day. Where helpful, articles include author information so you know who is behind a recommendation.
AI & human oversight
We may use tools (including AI) to assist research and drafting, but every review reflects real testing and is reviewed by a human before publishing. The verdict is ours, not a machine’s.